Organization: Marta Pacheco Pinto and Catarina Apolinário de Almeida (project TECOP, LOCUS group)
Colection:The Portuguese-Speaking World: Its History, Politics and Culture
Edition: Brighton, Chicago and Toronto: Sussex Academic Press
Research on Portuguese orientalism has until recently centred on the earliest traditions of orientalist knowledge production, primarily bound to the missionary project and the promotion of a Catholic orientalism headquartered in South Asia. In contrast, reflection on the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is scarce and has relied on individual case studies, notwithstanding the TECOP (Texts and Contexts of Portuguese Orientalism: The International Congresses of Orientalists, 1873–1973) research project. This edited collection is the result of an international forum (www.tecop.letras.ulisboa.pt) hosted by the Centre for Comparative Studies, University of Lisbon.
The editorial aim is to counter the scant attention paid to Portuguese orientalist scholarship, which has been peripheralized within the comparative history of western orientalisms at large and within national orientalisms in particular. Incorporating Portugal into a broader European (colonial) discourse about the East, and discussing the responses to Portuguese colonial legacies, gives visibility to the agency of the multiple actors and networks implicated in the Portuguese modern connection to the East. Essays cover former Portuguese India, Macau, Timor and Japan, as well as the Philippines, East Africa, Egypt, and even Angola as an expansive site of the Portuguese orientalist rhetoric. The chapters revisit Edward Said’s Orientalism (1978), making use of its analytical framework. They foster an interdisciplinary understanding of Portuguese orientalism as an epistemological system supported by a (male) elite – either intellectual, scientific or literary – that assumed different material manifestations in the shape of colonial policies; scientific expeditions; press and literary publications; radio broadcasts; and the institutionalization itself of orientalist knowledge. This is the first collection in the English language overtly expressing an intention to examine this epistemological contribution.